On December 20, 2023, Brent will stop offering office hours.
- Video Course
- Video Course Overview
- General GMAT Strategies - 7 videos (free)
- Data Sufficiency - 16 videos (free)
- Arithmetic - 38 videos
- Powers and Roots - 36 videos
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 73 videos
- Word Problems - 48 videos
- Geometry - 42 videos
- Integer Properties - 38 videos
- Statistics - 20 videos
- Counting - 27 videos
- Probability - 23 videos
- Analytical Writing Assessment - 5 videos (free)
- Reading Comprehension - 10 videos (free)
- Critical Reasoning - 38 videos
- Sentence Correction - 70 videos
- Integrated Reasoning - 17 videos
- Study Guide
- Blog
- Philosophy
- Office Hours
- Extras
- Prices
Comment on Is k Divisible by 18?
I solved it in this way.
1) 2k is divisible by 9. Lets take 2k = 9 then k = 4.5. but k must be an integer. so take 2k=18, then k = 9 which is not divisible by 18.
when 2k=36, k = 18 which is divisible by 18.
So statement 1 is not sufficient.
2) 9k is divisible by 2 which means 9k is even
so, k must be even which means k can be.
But 2 is not divisible by 18.
Same time 18 is also even, 18 is divisible by 18. So statement 2 is also not sufficient.
Combining we can say, k must be even and divisible by 9. so obviously as it includes 2, 2 x (multipliers of 9) always will be divided by 18. So, Answer is C.
Perfect!
Perfect!
Can we just say:
1: 2 isn´t divisible by 9, so k has to be.
2: 9 isn´t divisible by 2, so k has to be.
1 & 2: k is divisible by 9 and 2, so it has to be divisible by 2 times 9.
Thanks for your thoughts.
I agree with "1 & 2: k is
I agree with "1 & 2: k is divisible by 9 and 2, so it has to be divisible by 2 times 9."
For your first 2 comments, I'm not sure what you mean by "so k has to be"
Has to be what?
I meant to say:
1: 2 isn´t divisible by 9, so k has to be divisible by 2. However, maybe not by 18.
2: 9 isn´t divisible by 2, so k has to be divisible by 9. However, maybe not by 18.
and then combining, k needs to be div. by 2 and 9, thus also 18.
are the assumptions based on 1 and 2 ok that way?
Yes, that's correct.
Yes, that's correct.
In first statement K = 3*3*?*
Yes, that's a perfect summary
Yes, that's a perfect summary of the concepts involved!
Hi Brent, individual is not
Is this way of calculation correct? Thanks Brent for your great help always and sorry for too many questins from me :)
I don't follow your solution.
I don't follow your solution.
What do the expressions 2k/9 and 9k/2 represent?
And why does "2k/9 * 9k/2 = 18k/18 = k" make the two combined statements sufficient?
My bad Brent.
2k/9 and 9k/2 are from St 1 and 2.
So in combined I multiply them? Is that possible or not the right way?
I understand that 2k/9 and 9k
I understand that 2k/9 and 9k/2 are from statements 1 and 2, but why are you dividing 2k by 9, and dividing 9k by 2?
Also, why did you multiply these values?
It's hard for me to tell whether your solution is valid if I can't follow the steps you took.
I need you to tell me more about your rationale.
Hi Brent, I divide 2k by 9
In combined both statements, I multiply these values to see if k is divisible by 9 * 2?
My bad if not explain it properly.
I would stay clear of that
I would stay clear of that strategy. Here's why:
Let's say the question is:
Is integer k divisible by 11?
(1) 2k divisible by 9
(2) 9k divisible by 2
If we apply the same solution you applied, we conclude that the answer is C, BUT the answer is actually E.
Now consider this question:
Is integer k divisible by 3?
(1) 2k divisible by 9
(2) 9k divisible by 2
If we apply the same solution you applied, we conclude that the answer is C, BUT the answer here is A.