Have questions about your preparation or an upcoming test? Need help modifying the Study Plan to meet your unique needs? No problem. Just book a Skype meeting with Brent to discuss these and any other questions you may have.
- Video Course
- Video Course Overview
- General GMAT Strategies - 7 videos (free)
- Data Sufficiency - 16 videos (free)
- Arithmetic - 38 videos
- Powers and Roots - 36 videos
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 73 videos
- Word Problems - 48 videos
- Geometry - 42 videos
- Integer Properties - 38 videos
- Statistics - 20 videos
- Counting - 27 videos
- Probability - 23 videos
- Analytical Writing Assessment - 5 videos (free)
- Reading Comprehension - 10 videos (free)
- Critical Reasoning - 38 videos
- Sentence Correction - 70 videos
- Integrated Reasoning - 17 videos
- Study Guide
- Blog
- Philosophy
- Office Hours
- Extras
- Prices
Comment on Modifiers - Part I
neatly and nicely explained.
In case of the verb modifier
Martha served to the children sandwiches filled with cheese.
Martha served sandwiches filled with cheese to the children.
Perhaps. The key point is
Perhaps. The key point is that both sentences prevent ambiguity.
I like your vedio courses.
Thanks,
Genet
Thanks Genet!
Thanks Genet!
Jack hurried to paint the
If you ask the question "who?
If you ask the question "who?" when referring to an infinitive phrase, then you already presupposing that the infinitive phrase is modifying a noun (a human noun to be more precise).
Instead, try asking: What is "to paint the bedroom" modifying? Is it telling us more about Jack, or is telling us more about the hurrying?
It's tells us more about the hurrying, so it's playing the role of an adverb.
Thanks
Hello Brent in the example of
Yes, we need the comma in
Yes, we need the comma in "Jack, wanting to get home before dinner, hurried to paint the bedroom." We need the commas because "wanting to get home before dinner" is providing additional (somewhat parenthetical) information.
Also, without the commas, it's much harder to read the sentence.
"to paint the bedroom" is a
An infinitive phrase can
An infinitive phrase can function as a noun, adjective or verb.
For more, see
https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-sentence-correction/video/1156 (infinitive phrases starts at 8:40 in the video)
Is the below sentence correct
Bob and Doug talked noisily throughout the entire movie.
That sentence is correct.
That sentence is correct.
The adverb "noisily" correctly modifies the verb "talked"
Cheers,
Brent
Hi Brent! Is there any trick
Good question!
Good question!
Let's drop all modifiers and start with "Jack talked"
Let's first deal with the modifier NOISILY.
Does this modify JACK or TALKED?
This one is straightforward; it provides more information about the TALKING.
Now onto "Throughout the entire movie"
Does this modify JACK or TALKED?
We can't really say that it modifies JACK, because in order to demonstrate that it modifies JACK, we have to bring up the word TALKED.
That is, if I asked you, "Tell me more about Jack," you wouldn't just respond with "throughout the entire movie." You'd need to mention the verb TALKED in order to provide a reasonable response.
However, if I asked "Tell me more about the talking," you could respond with "the talking lasted throughout the entire movie." Notice that we don't need to mention Jack at all.
Since the verb TALKED is instrumental in explaining the role the modifier ("Throughout the entire movie"), it must be the word that is getting modified.
Does that help?
Cheers,
Brent
Hi Brent,
Please refer Q : https://gmatclub.com/forum/unearthed-in-china-fossils-of-feathered-dinosaurs-offer-the-most-dram-104114.html
I am confused between A & D. Could you please explain why is D incorrect?
Thanks & Regards,
Abhirup
Question link: https:/
Question link: https://gmatclub.com/forum/unearthed-in-china-fossils-of-feathered-dinos...
ORIGINAL SENTENCE: Unearthed in China, fossils of feathered dinosaurs offer the most dramatic evidence yet discovered of the close evolutionary relationship between dinosaurs and birds.
D) have offered the most dramatic evidence of the close evolutionary relationship between dinosaurs and birds that have yet been discovered
In the original sentence, we have the line "the most dramatic evidence yet discovered"
So, out of all the EVIDENCE discovered so far, this NEW EVIDENCE is the most dramatic.
Looks good.
In D, it is unclear what "that have yet been discovered" refers to.
In fact, since this part is placed so close to "dinosaurs and birds," it sounds like the dinosaurs and birds have not yet been discovered.
Does that help?
Cheers,
Brent
Hi Brent,
Lets assume a modified version of answer choice D) have offered the most dramatic evidence of the close evolutionary relationship between dinosaurs and birds that HAS yet been discovered
In this case the answer choice looks correct to me because I know that a relative clause may jump before the prepositional phrases to modify the noun EVIDENCE. The basis of such a conclusion is that "of the close evolutionary relationship between dinosaurs and birds" is a vital noun modifier that modifies EVIDENCE. "HAS" agrees with singular EVIDENCE and hence we may conclude that the relative clause isn't modifying dinosaurs and birds. However, in the original answer option "HAVE" is used. "HAVE" agrees with plural "dinosaurs & birds" rather than "evidence". Hence in that case we may conclude that the relative clause is indeed not modifying EVIDENCE.
Is the above understanding correct?
Thanks & Regards,
Abhirup
Yes, your understanding is
Yes, your understanding is correct. Also, your modified version of answer choice D would be correct.
Cheers,
Brent
Thanks Brent!!
Hi Brent,
Is "yet discovered" is a modifier? What does in modifies? Verb "offer" or the whole prepositional phrase "the most dramatic evidence"?
Unearthed in China, fossils
Unearthed in China, fossils of feathered dinosaurs offer the most dramatic evidence YET DISCOVERED of the close evolutionary relationship between dinosaurs and birds.
In this case, YET DISCOVERED modified EVIDENCE (Q: What kind of evidence? A: Yet discovered evidence)
Hi Brent,
Please refer this correct sentence : A study by the Ocean Wildlife Campaign urged states to undertake a number of remedies to reverse a decline in the shark population, including establishing size limits for shark catches, closing state waters for shark fishing during pupping season, and requiring commercial fishers to have federal shark permits.
In sentences such as these can the verb-ing modifier(including) modify any noun/noun phrase in the preceding clause? I was under the impression that comma + verb-ing modifier after a clause could either modify the SUBJECT of the preceding clause or give additional information regarding the consequence of the action in preceding clause. But in the above sentence it actually modifies "a number of remedies", which is not the SUBJECT of the clause. I am confused. Please help.
Thanks & Regards,
Abhirup
Question link: https:/
Question link: https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-study-by-the-ocean-wildlife-campaign-urged-...
Hi Abhirup,
The comma + verb-ing modifier need not modify the subject of the clause before it; it can modify any noun.
For example, "Joe loves eating a variety of fish, including salmon, tuna and cod.
Cheers,
Brent
Hi Brent,
I have a question about this GMAT SC question https://gmatclub.com/forum/outlining-his-strategy-for-nursing-the-troubled-conglomerate-back-to-145189.html
D)executive announced plans Wednesday to cut the company’s huge debt by selling nearly $12 billion in assets over the next 18 months
I have an issue with the infinitive phrase "to cut...". I can't understand why it is acceptable when it is separated from the noun it modifies(plans).
And what role does this infinitive phrase plays in the sentence? Is it like an adjective for "plans".
I eliminated this answer because the touch roule is not met.
Thank you in advance,
Link: https://gmatclub.com
Link: https://gmatclub.com/forum/outlining-his-strategy-for-nursing-the-troubl...
D) Outlining his strategy for nursing the troubled conglomerate back to health, the chief executive announced plans Wednesday to cut the company's huge debt by selling nearly $12 billion in assets over the next 18 months
This is one of those cases in which the other 4 answer choices are so flawed, we can quickly eliminate them. This, however, doesn't mean the remaining answer choice is perfect.
Notice that closing the gap creates some ambiguity: ...the chief executive announced Wednesday plans to cut.....
This sounds like Wednesday modifies plans.
In some cases on the GMAT, the best answer is the least bad answer.
I hope that helps.
Cheers,
Brent
wanting to get home before
THANKS IN ADVACE
You're correct to say that
You're correct to say that two INDEPENDENT clauses must be separated by either a semicolon or a COMMA + CONJUNCTION.
However, "Wanting to get home before dinner" is not an independent clause, because it does not contain a subject.
"Wanting to get home before dinner" is a participial phrase modifying JACK.
Does that help?
got it sir
Hi Brent,
Could you please explain why C is incorrect and A is correct,
Over the course of the eighteenth century, the average output of ironwork tripled as a result of several improvements in blowing machinery and because coal replaced charcoal as the fuel used in the smelting of iron ore.
A. Over the course of the eighteenth century, the average output of ironwork tripled as a result of several improvements in blowing machinery and because coal replaced charcoal as the fuel used in the smelting of iron ore.
B. Over the course of the eighteenth century a tripling in the average output of ironwork was due to the replacement of charcoal by coal for the fuel used in the smelting of iron ore, in addition to several improvements in blowing machinery.
C. With charcoal's being replaced by coal as the fuel used in the smelting of iron ore and several improvements in blowing machinery, the average output of ironwork tripled over the eighteenth century.
D. The replacement of charcoal with coal for the fuel used in the smelting of iron ore and several improvements in blowing machinery, the average output of ironwork tripled over the eighteenth century.
E. Charcoal being replaced by coal as the fuel used in the smelting of iron ore, and several improvements in blowing machinery, which tripled the average output of ironwork over the course of the eighteenth century.
Thank you in advance,
Link: https://gmatclub.com
Link: https://gmatclub.com/forum/over-the-course-of-the-eighteenth-century-the...
(C) With charcoal's BEING REPLACED by coal as the fuel used in the smelting of iron ore and several improvements in blowing machinery, the average output of ironwork tripled over the eighteenth century.
The REPLACEMENT already took place in the 18th century.
BEING REPLACED suggests that the replacement continues to occur.
No good.
(A) Over the course of the eighteenth century, the average output of ironwork tripled as a result of several improvements in blowing machinery AND because coal replaced charcoal as the fuel used in the smelting of iron ore.
We are told that output tripled. We are also told that there are two reasons for this:
- as a result of several improvements in blowing machinery
- because coal replaced charcoal as the fuel used in the smelting of iron ore.
Let's examine the sentence construction when we include ONLY one reason. We get:
"...output of ironwork tripled as a result of several improvements in blowing machinery" GREAT.
"...output of ironwork tripled because coal replaced charcoal as the fuel used in the smelting of iron ore." GREAT.
With answer choice A, we are merely adding AND between both reasons.
Answer: A
Cheers,
Brent
Hi Brent,
Thank you so much.
Good one,
Filled with cheese
Isn'it verb-ed modifier?
Once you said participle phrase then noun modifier.. Didn't get it properly
A participial phrase is a
A participial phrase is a phrase that begins with a participle.
My video on participles: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-sentence-correction/video/1157
My video on phrases: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-sentence-correction/video/1156
Participial phrases always modify nouns.
At 5:50 in the video, we have: "Martha served sandwiches to the children filled with cheese"
Here, FILLED WITH CHEESE, is a participle, and it is meant to modify the noun SANDWICHES.
What kind of sandwiches?
The ones that are FILLED WITH CHEESE.
Does that help?
You said that "to the
TO can be a preposition (e.g.
TO can be a preposition (e.g., Joe went TO the store), and TO can be paired with a verb to create an infinitive (e.g., TO RUN, TO JUMP, TO THINK, etc.)
In the case of the phrase "to the children," we don't have a verb to pair with TO, so we don't have an infinitive phrase.
Cheers,
Brent
How can we tell the
The biggest difference is
The biggest difference is that a dependent CLAUSE contains both a subject and a verb, whereas a PHRASE does not contain both.
More on clauses here: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-sentence-correction/video/1154
lol children sandwich doesn't
Hi Brent
I have a doubt about the following sentence - The pizza 'made' with locally sourced ingredients 'looked' divine.
So, if I understood correctly, here: 'made' is a modifier modifying the noun 'pizza', and 'looked' is also a modifier modifying the noun 'divine'.
Am I correct? Or 'looked' is a verb telling about the state of being of 'pizza'? And if 'looked' is a verb then if we modify the sentence as "The pizza...tastes (or smells) divine", would 'tastes' or 'smells' also be a verb?
The pizza MADE with locally
The pizza MADE with locally sourced ingredients LOOKED divine.
You are correct to say that the phrase "MADE with locally sourced ingredients" modifies the noun PIZZA.
So, if we ignore that modifying phrase we get: The pizza LOOKED divine.
Here, LOOKED is a linking verb that links PIZZA to its state of being (looking divine)
More here on linking verbs:
- https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-sentence-correction/video/1150 (starting at 2:00)
- https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-sentence-correction/video/1151
Oh, yes! Sometimes it gets
In the first example, S
Why is carrying a participle, isn't it a verb.
and also isn't "toward" worng, should it not be "towards" (S-V Agreement?)
Great question!!
Great question!!
TOWARDS isn't a verb; it's a preposition.
So, TOWARDS is neither singular or plural.
TOWARD and TOWARDS mean the same thing. TOWARD is favored in Canada and the US, while other countries prefer TOWARDS.
The GMAT will never have a question where you must choose between TOWARD and TOWARDS.