Question: 2x over y

Comment on 2x over y

Why do we have (y -ve for first statement) --if we multiply both sides by y (-ve or +ve) we get rid of Y and we are left with 2x > 10 ---which gives unique result i.e. x> 5
gmat-admin's picture

The problem with that approach (multiplying both sides by y) is that we don't know whether y is positive or negative.

If y is negative, we must reverse the inequality sign. If y is positive, the direction of the inequality sign stays the same.

For more see https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-algebra-and-equation-solving/vid...

So is it safe to say you shouldn't assume +/- for a variable in a DS question? I just assumed y was positive because it was written as y, and not -y.
gmat-admin's picture

That's correct. Having or not having a negative symbol in front of a variable doesn't tell us anything about whether that variable is positive or negative.
For example, x can be negative or positive.
Likewise, -x can be negative or positive.

then in the second case how do we know y is positive?
gmat-admin's picture

While rewriting the inequality in statement 2, we are able to avoid multiplying or dividing both sides of the inequality by a variable. So, in the end, we can be certain that y is greater than zero.

If in above problem assume it turns out that y is negative as the outcome of second equation, answer still be C, right? Logic is by combining we can arrive to a conclusion that x is not positive. Please correct if wrong.
gmat-admin's picture

IF we had been able to conclude (from statement 2) that y is negative, then the answer would be E.

From statement 1, we learned that, if y is negative, then x < 5

So, when we combine the two statements, we can conclude that x < 5

The target question asks "Is x negative?"

So, if x < 5, then x COULD equal 4, which means x IS positive.
Conversely, if x < 5, then x COULD equal -1, which means x is NOT positive.
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are not sufficient.

Brilliant explanation in simplest way.

Great question, I completely ignored the Y after solve the first equation, incorrectly chose A because if x is greater than 5 of course it is greater than 0...
gmat-admin's picture

You're not alone. Many students will forget that y can be either positive or negative.

Great video Brent. If using a number line here, x>0? mean x = 1,2,3,5,6...etc. Combined result is x > 5. So that mean x could be 6,7,8... and there's a gap between 0 ~ 5 on the number lines. So shouldn't this be E. Did I miss something here? Thanks Brent.

Think I get it now Brent to my previous question. To clarify x>0 is a question and not a statement. Therefore x>5 is sufficient to say x is positive. Is this corrent? Thanks Brent
gmat-admin's picture

That's correct.
The target question, "Is x > 0?" contains no given information.
So, if we know that x > 5, then we can be certain that x > 0.
In other words, the answer to the target question is a definite YES (x IS greater than 0), which means the statement is sufficient.

Brilliant thanks Brent for confirmation.

Office Hours

On December 20, 2023, Brent will stop offering office hours. 

Change Playback Speed

You have the option of watching the videos at various speeds (25% faster, 50% faster, etc). To change the playback speed, click the settings icon on the right side of the video status bar.

Have a question about this video?

Post your question in the Comment section below, and a GMAT expert will answer it as fast as humanly possible.

Free “Question of the Day” emails!