Have questions about your preparation or an upcoming test? Need help modifying the Study Plan to meet your unique needs? No problem. Just book a Skype meeting with Brent to discuss these and any other questions you may have.

- Video Course
- Video Course Overview
- General GMAT Strategies - 7 videos (free)
- Data Sufficiency - 16 videos (free)
- Arithmetic - 38 videos
- Powers and Roots - 36 videos
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 73 videos
- Word Problems - 48 videos
- Geometry - 42 videos
- Integer Properties - 38 videos
- Statistics - 20 videos
- Counting - 27 videos
- Probability - 23 videos
- Analytical Writing Assessment - 5 videos (free)
- Reading Comprehension - 10 videos (free)
- Critical Reasoning - 38 videos
- Sentence Correction - 70 videos
- Integrated Reasoning - 17 videos

- Study Guide
- Your Instructor
- Office Hours
- Extras
- Prices

## Comment on

353 squared## DIABOLICAL!

## Great solution! I used a

## Beautiful - very clever

Beautiful - very clever approach!!

## Brent,

I used a different approach:

Let 352 = x

so, 353 = x+1

Doing so:

(x+1)^2-x^2

(x^2+2x+1)-x^2=2x+1

Substituting x = 352

2(352)+1=705

So I got ans. E

What do you think about?

Cheers,

Pedro

## That's a great approach -

That's a great approach - well done, Pedro!

## Unbelievable

## I used a slightly different

Instead of using difference of squares directly, I recognized 353^2 is the same as (352+1)^2

So your expression works out to be: (352+1)^2 - 352^2

Since we know that 352^2 will cancel out, you only solve the "2xy" (2*352*1) part of the equation and add the 1^2 to it, which gives us 705.

## Very nice reasoning!

Very nice reasoning!

## Hi Brent, this might sound

## Pure witchcraft - burn the

Pure witchcraft - burn the witch!!! :-)

I LOVE your approach!

Using smaller numbers, you saw a pattern and applied that pattern to the larger numbers in the question.

The main reason your approach worked was that the numbers were consecutive.

For example, we can't use the exact same approach if the numbers were two apart (e.g., 126² - 124²). HOWEVER, your approach of testing smaller numbers will still get you on the right track. Give it a try.

Cheers,

Brent

## Is it incorrect to say (352 +

= 352^2 + 1^2 - 352^2

= 1^2

= 1

## That would certainly make

That would certainly make things easier, except (352 + 1)² does not equal 352² + 1².

In general, (x + y)² ≠ x² + y²

We can also test a few cases to convince ourselves.

For example, is it true that (5 + 1)² = 5² + 1²?

Simplify both sides: 6² = 25 + 1

Simplify again: 36 = 26

No good. So, (5 + 1)² ≠ 5² + 1²

Likewise, is it true that (7 + 3)² = 7² + 3²?

Simplify both sides: 10² = 49 + 9

Simplify again: 100 = 58

No good. So, (7 + 3)² ≠ 7² + 3²

Let's take a closer look at what (x + y)² SHOULD equal.

(x + y)² = (x + y)(x + y)

= x² + xy + xy + y²

= x² + 2xy + y²

Likewise, (352 + 1)² = (352 + 1)(352 + 1)

= 352² + 2(352)(1) + 1²

Cheers,

Brent

## Thanks!

## Hey Brent, one question:

Hey Brent, one question:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/which-of-the-following-expressions-can-be-wri...

Besides checking back with the answer choices, could we know whether II is an integer?

Cause possibly, 10 times 0,1 is also an integer, so is 4 times 0,25.

So just by checking on whether one nr is not an integer no necessarily gives us certainty, right?

## Hmmm, that's odd.

Hmmm, that's odd.

I made a small edit to your question, and it now looks like I asked the question.

That's correct.

Just because one of the two values is an integer (and the other is not an integer), we can't make any conclusions on whether their product is an integer.

## Add a comment