If you have any questions, ask them on the Beat The GMAT discussion forums. The average response time is typically __less than 30 minutes__.

- GMAT Video Course
- Video Course Overview - READ FIRST
- General GMAT Strategies - 7 videos (all free)
- Data Sufficiency - 16 videos (all free)
- Arithmetic - 38 videos (some free)
- Powers and Roots - 36 videos (some free)
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 73 videos (some free)
- Word Problems - 48 videos (some free)
- Geometry - 42 videos (some free)
- Integer Properties - 38 videos (some free)
- Statistics - 20 videos (some free)
- Counting - 27 videos (some free)
- Probability - 23 videos (some free)
- Analytical Writing Assessment - 5 videos (all free)
- Reading Comprehension - 10 videos (all free)
- Critical Reasoning - 38 videos (some free)
- Sentence Correction - 70 videos (some free)
- Integrated Reasoning - 17 videos (some free)

- Learning Guide
- Extra Resources
- Guarantees
- About
- Get Started

## Comment on

Inequalities - Part II## Just want to make sure I'm

Also on a separate note, it seems that the lessons in the prior chapters kind of build on each other and vice versa and whatnot... (i.e. this video will help me with # property questions and arithmetic questions). Was there a certain reason behind why you ordered your quant video chapters the way they are? Thanks!

## We're told that y < x AND x +

We're told that y < x AND x + 5 < z

So, once we recognize that it is always the case x < x + 5, then we can combine the two inequalities.

I spent A LOT of time thinking about the order in which the topics appear. My goal was to make sure that, if learning concept C requires knowledge about concept A, then concept A must appear before concept C.

For example, we need to know how to collect like terms (i.e., 7x - 2x = 5x) before we can solve basic equations (like 7x - 9 = 2x + 11). So, the video on collecting like terms appears before basic equation solving.

And so on...

## thank you - I love your

## Thanks! I appreciate that.

Thanks! I appreciate that.

## Hi Brent,

For the final example in the video, can we write the relationship between y and w as follows,

y < x < w-5

Deepak

## You're referring to the

You're referring to the question that begins at 4:55 in the video.

Yes, your inequality is good. You just need to keep going, because we're asked to compare y and w (not y and w-5)

Given: y < x

x + 5 < w

You took the second inequality and subtracted 5 from both sides to get: x < w - 5

Then you combined this with the first inequality to get: y < x < w-5

Since we're trying to compare y and w, we need to recognize that w-5 < w for all values of w

So, we can add this last part to your inequality to get:

y < x < w-5 < w, which means we can be certain that y < w

## Add a comment