# Question: Passing Through Quadrant II

## Comment on Passing Through Quadrant II

### how do I know if the slope is

how do I know if the slope is negative or positive by sketch it or by looking at the graph
thanks

### Move along a line from left

Move along a line from left to right. If you rise as you move from left to rise, then the slope is positive. If you get lower as you move from left to right, then the slope is negative.

### For statement 1, line could

For statement 1, line could also have a positive slope and never pass through quadrant 2!

### That's also true!

That's also true!

Cheers,
Brent

### Shouldn't the answer be E as

Shouldn't the answer be E as a negative slope can also move from III to IV or II to IV? similar to the first statement analysis.

### If the slope is negative,

If the slope is negative, then the line will (eventually) pass through 3 quadrants (one of which will be quadrant II)

Cheers,
Brent

### Brent, Can you please explain

Brent, Can you please explain further on your statement that "If the slope is negative, then the line will (eventually) pass through 3 quadrants". Isn't it possible to have a negative slope and the line still stays within quadrant III and IV ? Like the picture on the right hand side ?

### Good question!

Good question!

I believe you're thinking about a line segment (which has a finite length).
If we were dealing with a line segment with a negative slope, then it would be possible for that line segment to pass through 1 or 2 or 3 quadrants.

However, the question involves a line, and lines go on forever without end.
So, if we take the line that appears at 1:52 in the video, and extend it forever in both directions, the line will eventually cross into quadrant II.

Does that help?

Cheers,
Brent

### Ah..Got it. That makes sense

Ah..Got it. That makes sense. You are right, I was thinking of a line segment, not an infinite line. Thank you!

### Hi,

Hi,
I want to clarify the STATEMENT 1.

The second red line you draw that crossing Quand II. But it's wrong because X IS NOT = 0 ?

As I know from the theory:
"To find the y-intercept , plug x=0 into the equation"

### Hi Sam,

Hi Sam,

For statement 1, the second line I drew has a negative y-intercept. We know this because the point shown on the y-axis has a negative y-coordinate. Also noticed that the same point has 0 for its x-coordinate.

So for example, the point shown on the y-axis COULD have the coordinates (0, -3). If this were the case, then the y-intercept would be -3. More importantly, the x-coordinate of that point is 0.

To further my point, that's recognize that the equation of that second line COULD be y = -2x - 3 (this equation tells us that the slope of the line is -2, and it's y-intercept is -3.

Also, if x = 0, then y = -3, thus the point (0, -3) on the line

Does that help?