Have questions about your preparation or an upcoming test? Need help modifying the Study Plan to meet your unique needs? No problem. Just book a Skype meeting with Brent to discuss these and any other questions you may have.
- Video Course
- Video Course Overview
- General GMAT Strategies - 7 videos (free)
- Data Sufficiency - 16 videos (free)
- Arithmetic - 38 videos
- Powers and Roots - 36 videos
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 73 videos
- Word Problems - 48 videos
- Geometry - 42 videos
- Integer Properties - 38 videos
- Statistics - 20 videos
- Counting - 27 videos
- Probability - 23 videos
- Analytical Writing Assessment - 5 videos (free)
- Reading Comprehension - 10 videos (free)
- Critical Reasoning - 38 videos
- Sentence Correction - 70 videos
- Integrated Reasoning - 17 videos
- Study Guide
- Office Hours
Comment on Ayla and Chayna
If the question was: Which of the following, when added to the argument as an additional premise, makes the argument logically correct.
What question type then it would be:
1. Weaken the Argument
2. Strengthen the Argument
5. Method of Reasoning
6. Flawed Argument
This is a bit of a hybrid
This is a bit of a hybrid question.
One could argue that it's an ASSUMPTION question, since we need a certain piece of information to make the conclusion follow.
One could also argue that it's a FLAWED ARGUMENT question.
I'd say it's more of an ASSUMPTION question than anything.
It's important to note that this is a deductive argument (rather than the typical inductive argument we find on the GMAT). So, that already makes it a bit of an outlier question.
Thank you Brent