# Lesson: Lines and Angles

## Comment on Lines and Angles

### the Improvement Charts are

the Improvement Charts are really great, thanks a lot =)

do you also have those for 2017 and for the Quantitative Review ? =) ### Thanks!

Thanks!
No, we haven't created similar resources for the quant-only books.

### no problem.

no problem.

But found it for 2017

would you recommend the Manhattan Quant Books ?

Ive got 1 month+ left (already went over official guide + math only + verbal only + 1729 videos on khan (73% wom mission), all magoosh videos, and soon all your videos :)

But still have serious doubts to get 700+ ### The Manhattan books are great

The Manhattan books are great. However, I’d like to point out that HOW you study is just as important as WHAT you study. In my opinion, many students don’t dig deep enough while learning the concepts tested on the GMAT.

Many students spend a lot of their time answering random/unrelated practice questions (a geometry question then a statistics question, algebra question, geometry question, probability question, etc.).

This strategy doesn’t allow you to fully explore the intricacies of each concept, and this is very limiting, because the test-makers can take ANY concept (no matter how simple) and create dozens of wildly different questions, each requiring a different approach. So, to achieve great score, you must answer tons of practice questions that are specifically-related to each individual concept tested on the GMAT.

Please note that, when I say “concept,” I’m not referring to broad topics like Statistics or Geometry; I’m referring to the *individual concepts* that comprise those topics. For example, the concepts that fall under the umbrella of “Geometry” include the properties of parallel lines, triangles, right triangles, special right triangles, quadrilaterals, circles, etc. For each of these, you need to understand/anticipate all of the various ways the test-makers can evaluate your knowledge.

Cheers,
Brent

### Grasping and effectively

Grasping and effectively applying the concepts is what concerns me the most. I have started the 60 day study plan, but I feel a bit rushed. If I can carve out an average of 4 hours a day during the week and about 6 hrs Sat & Sun, do you think it's reasonable to go from a 490 (practice) to between 600-650 on test day within 60 days? ### Hi Paul,

Hi Paul,

An increase from 490 to 600+ is possible, but it will take a lot of time and energy.

If you're following the 60-Day Study Guide (https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/gmat-guide), then on Day 22, you'll take another practice test. This will give you a good idea of your score trajectory and the time it will take to reach 600+.

Cheers,
Brent

### sir i m having doubt in this

sir i m having doubt in this question
https://gmatclub.com/forum/in-the-gure-shown-lines-k-and-m-are-parallel-to-each-other-is-x-z-201939.html ### Hi, even after going through

Hi, even after going through the solutions mentioned for: http://gmatclub.com/forum/if-in-the-figure-above-l1-and-l2-are-parallel-what-is-x-224812.html

I am unable to understand the concept. Could you please tell me how i should approach this question and solve it?

Thanks ### Hi aanchal890,

Hi aanchal890,

I'm happy to help.

I provide a step-by-step solution here: https://gmatclub.com/forum/if-in-the-figure-above-l1-and-l2-are-parallel...

If you tell me which step(s) you'd like me to go over, I can help.

Cheers,
Brent

### Hi Brent,

Hi Brent,

In questions like in the below link, should we never assume the lines to be parallel even though they are named as L1 and L2; L3 and L4?

https://gmatclub.com/forum/what-is-the-value-of-x-187602.html That's correct; we can't assume that any lines are parallel unless we're told so (either directly or indirectly)

Cheers,
Brent

### On a DS question, what are

On a DS question, what are some of the terms used to typically indicate that the lines are parallel and intersect?

You mention that parallel lines on their own are not that interesting. What do you mean by this? Does that mean that we can't derive any useful information just from this fact? ### The most common way is to

The most common way is to just specify that two lines are parallel.

However, there are times when you're indirectly told two lines are parallel.
For example in the diagram here https://imgur.com/a/vbsEXdV, the fact that those two angles are both equal to x°, then we can be certain that line k || line j

All I meant by that comment is that 2 parallel lines on their own (without any transversals) are kind of boring.

Cheers,
Brent

### https://gmatclub.com/forum

https://gmatclub.com/forum/what-is-the-value-of-x-187602.html

If both the lines were parallel in this question, would that be sufficient to derive x? If so, does that mean that when two lines are parallel they have the same properties - creating the same angles and bisecting the lines equally? If line 1 and 2 were parallel AND lines 3 and 4 were parallel, we'd still need one angle measurement to determine the value of x.

Your question: Does that mean that when two lines are parallel they have the same properties - creating the same angles and bisecting the lines equally?
I think I agree with that (other than the bisecting part. What is getting bisected?)
That said, rather than try to create a universal rule regarding the intersections of two pairs of parallel lines, it's probably easier to just treat each intersection as a transversal passing through parallel lines.

Cheers,
Brent

### So if all lines were parallel

So if all lines were parallel and if given the value of y=70 in this case, then statement 2 would be sufficient? ### Yes, that's correct.

Yes, that's correct.

### https://gmatclub.com/forum

https://gmatclub.com/forum/what-is-the-value-of-x-in-the-figure-above-1-x-40-2-x-y-274585.html

How do we know when opposite angles are equal to each other? In this diagram, it doesn't look like we could infer that the angle opposite the 40 degrees is 40 degrees or that the angle x+y = to its sum. It doesn't work given the properties of a straight line and that x+y would equal 100 degrees. Opposite angles are always equal to each other.
Whenever you have two lines intersecting each other, there will have two pairs of opposite angles, and those opposite angles will be equal.

I believe you are wondering how we know for sure that the lines are actually straight.
On the GMAT, all lines that appear to be straight can be assumed to be straight.

For more on this, watch: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-geometry/video/863

### https://gmatclub.com/forum/in

https://gmatclub.com/forum/in-the-figure-above-x-y-285115.html#p2197101

Hi Brent,

What kind of approach you would apply to solve this?

Thanks a lot

Fatima-Zahra 