Have questions about your preparation or an upcoming test? Need help modifying the Study Plan to meet your unique needs? No problem. Just book a Skype meeting with Brent to discuss these and any other questions you may have.

- Video Course
- Video Course Overview
- General GMAT Strategies - 7 videos (free)
- Data Sufficiency - 16 videos (free)
- Arithmetic - 38 videos
- Powers and Roots - 36 videos
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 73 videos
- Word Problems - 48 videos
- Geometry - 42 videos
- Integer Properties - 38 videos
- Statistics - 20 videos
- Counting - 27 videos
- Probability - 23 videos
- Analytical Writing Assessment - 5 videos (free)
- Reading Comprehension - 10 videos (free)
- Critical Reasoning - 38 videos
- Sentence Correction - 70 videos
- Integrated Reasoning - 17 videos

- Study Guide
- Blog
- Philosophy
- Office Hours
- Extras
- Prices

## Comment on

3x-5## Hello,

I was able to solve using the approach however I first tried solving using: 2(3x-5)+2(x-15)=360 and got x=50

How come this doesn't work?

## That's the right idea, but

That's the right idea, but you have (x-15), when it should by (x+15)

## Here it is given x+15. x-15

## Hey Brent, what's your

Any rule of thumb for redrawing?

## I think redrawing the figures

I think redrawing the figures is almost always a good idea, especially if there are many missing angles and lengths in the figure. That said, if there's little information that can be added to the diagram, then I wouldn't bother.

For example, if a diagram consists of a right triangle with the lengths of two sides given, and your task is to determine the length of this missing side, then there wouldn't be much value in redrawing the triangle.

Cheers,

Brent