Now that you’ve mastered GMAT Geometry, it’s time to let the world know!

- GMAT Video Course
- Video Course Overview - READ FIRST
- General GMAT Strategies - 7 videos (all free)
- Data Sufficiency - 16 videos (all free)
- Arithmetic - 38 videos (some free)
- Powers and Roots - 36 videos (some free)
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 73 videos (some free)
- Word Problems - 48 videos (some free)
- Geometry - 42 videos (some free)
- Integer Properties - 38 videos (some free)
- Statistics - 20 videos (some free)
- Counting - 27 videos (some free)
- Probability - 23 videos (some free)
- Analytical Writing Assessment - 5 videos (all free)
- Reading Comprehension - 10 videos (all free)
- Critical Reasoning - 38 videos (some free)
- Sentence Correction - 70 videos (some free)
- Integrated Reasoning - 17 videos (some free)

- Learning Guide
- Extra Resources
- Guarantees
- About
- Prices

## Comment on

Tackling Data Sufficiency Questions## Why shouldn't we estimate

## There are 2 kinds of math

There are 2 kinds of math questions on the GMAT: Problem Solving questions and Data Sufficiency questions. In a Problem Solving question, the diagram will be drawn to scale unless stated otherwise. In a Data Sufficiency question, the diagrams are not necessarily NOT drawn to scale.

In this video (https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-geometry/video/885), we note that (at 0:50) one can use estimation for a Problem Solving question.

In the video above, we deal with strategies pertaining to Data Sufficiency geometry questions. Since the diagrams in Data Sufficiency questions are not necessarily NOT drawn to scale, we advise you to avoid estimation.

## Hi Brent,

I get your point on the statements together forcing the line to have only one length. But why should we not check till the point of at least formulating an equation that will find the length?

How can we be sure that the data will give us a length?

Additionally, I'm also curious as to how you use this data to find the length in this specific problem.

Thanks!

## Here's why we don't need an

Here's why we don't need an equation: if a statement forces a shape into having just one length, then we COULD just recreate a super accurate representation of the figure (using a compass, ruler, protractor, etc), and then measure the line with a ruler.

In the given diagram, we COULD draw an altitude from point A down to side AC. This altitude will divide the triangle into two equal triangles. Both triangles will be 30-60-90 right triangles with a base of length 5. We can then use what we know about 30-60-90 right triangles to calculate the length of side AB.

## Brent,

I am having a hard time understanding the solution to this question.

https://gmatclub.com/forum/if-in-the-figure-above-ad-db-and-de-2-what-is-the-length-of-line-se-224874.html

From your excellent 'lock-in' method, I found the length of AC can take more than one value and this value seems to be dependent on the angle x. However, the question asks if we can find the value of AC. Using statement 2, dont we get more than one value? Shouldnt the answer be C because we are looking for one value of AC? Please clarify.

## Keep in mind that we also

Keep in mind that we also know that AD = DB.

So, once we know that DE||AC, we have similar triangles (i.e., ∆ABC ~ ∆DBE), which means ∆ABC is TWICE the size ∆DBE (since AB = 2DB)

Since DE = √2, we can be certain that AC = 2√2

## Keep in mind that we also

Keep in mind that we also know that AD = DB.

So, once we know that DE||AC, we have similar triangles (i.e., ∆ABC ~ ∆DBE), which means ∆ABC is TWICE the size ∆DBE (since AB = 2DB)

Since DE = √2, we can be certain that AC = 2√2

## Hi Brent,

How is AD= DB? It's AE = AC. Also i didn't got DE || AC.

## arjuna is referring to the

arjuna is referring to the question here:

https://gmatclub.com/forum/if-in-the-figure-above-ad-db-and-de-2-what-is...

## Add a comment