Have questions about your preparation or an upcoming test? Need help modifying the Study Plan to meet your unique needs? No problem. Just book a Skype meeting with Brent to discuss these and any other questions you may have.

- Video Course
- Video Course Overview
- General GMAT Strategies - 7 videos (free)
- Data Sufficiency - 16 videos (free)
- Arithmetic - 38 videos
- Powers and Roots - 36 videos
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 73 videos
- Word Problems - 48 videos
- Geometry - 42 videos
- Integer Properties - 38 videos
- Statistics - 20 videos
- Counting - 27 videos
- Probability - 23 videos
- Analytical Writing Assessment - 5 videos (free)
- Reading Comprehension - 10 videos (free)
- Critical Reasoning - 38 videos
- Sentence Correction - 70 videos
- Integrated Reasoning - 17 videos

- Study Guide
- Your Instructor
- Office Hours
- Extras
- Prices

## Comment on

Comparing Areas## considering the first given

Also as AC is the diagonal of rectangle ABCD therefore triangle ABC becomes 45-45-90 triangle which eventually fixes the way this fig looks so we can not extend or contract this figure to find out if this statement is sufficient or not.

However comparing these two triangles, we can easily find out bases of both triangle CBE and ABC, and from that information, we can find out base of triangle ACE and then we can compare bases of both triangles CBE ans ACE to answer our given question.So according to me this statement is sufficient.

Please correct me if I am wrong somewhere.

## There's an error when you say

There's an error when you say: "Also as AC is the diagonal of rectangle ABCD therefore triangle ABC becomes 45-45-90"

IF we were told that ABCD is a SQUARE, then ABC definitely be a 45-45-90 triangle. However, we're told that ABCD is a RECTANGLE, in which case, we can't conclude that ABC is a 45-45-90 triangle.

## Thanks for your quick

## Brent,

I did not understand why statement 1 is not sufficient.

The angle ACB is not 45°? so, ACE would be 15°?

Please explain me why am I wronging?

Thanks

Pedro

## Hi Pedro,

Hi Pedro,

IF it were the case that ABCD is a SQUARE, then angle ACB would be 45°. However, we're not told that ABCD is a square.

Cheers,

Brent

## Does this imply that

## That is correct.

That is correct.

Here's an image that definitively shows that the diagonal of a rectangle is not an angle bisector: http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-TDhToIPWNFI/TkXXxns4JTI/AAAAAAAABB0/4accHIDqT1...

Cheers,

Brent

## Add a comment