Have questions about your preparation or an upcoming test? Need help modifying the Study Plan to meet your unique needs? No problem. Just book a Skype meeting with Brent to discuss these and any other questions you may have.

- Video Course
- Video Course Overview - READ FIRST
- General GMAT Strategies - 7 videos (all free)
- Data Sufficiency - 16 videos (all free)
- Arithmetic - 38 videos (some free)
- Powers and Roots - 36 videos (some free)
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 73 videos (some free)
- Word Problems - 48 videos (some free)
- Geometry - 42 videos (some free)
- Integer Properties - 38 videos (some free)
- Statistics - 20 videos (some free)
- Counting - 27 videos (some free)
- Probability - 23 videos (some free)
- Analytical Writing Assessment - 5 videos (all free)
- Reading Comprehension - 10 videos (all free)
- Critical Reasoning - 38 videos (some free)
- Sentence Correction - 70 videos (some free)
- Integrated Reasoning - 17 videos (some free)

- Study Guide
- Office Hours
- Extras
- Guarantees
- Prices

## Comment on

Divisibility Rules## Hi, are there any similar

## There are other rules for

There are other rules for other numbers (like 7, 8, 11, etc), but I've never seen an official GMAT question that requires those rules. So, we have left them out.

## Sure, thanks!

And thank you for this really wonderful video course!

## Glad you like it!

Glad you like it!

## Hey, how come we say that 0

## Hi Byefox,

Hi Byefox,

20 is divisible by 4, because we can take 20 cookies and divide them into 4 EQUAL groups of 5 cookies each.

Likewise, 0 is divisible by 4, because we can take 0 cookies and divide them into 4 EQUAL groups of 0 cookies each.

Quote from the Official Guide for GMAT Review:

"If x and y are integers and x ≠ 0, then x is a divisor (factor) of y provided that y = xn for some integer n. In this case, y is also said to be divisible by x or to be a multiple of x.

For example, 7 is a divisor or factor of 28 since 28 = (7)(4), but 8 is not a divisor of 28 since there is no integer n such that 28 = 8n"

So, 12 is divisible by 4, since we can write 12 = (4)(3), where 3 is an integer.

Likewise, 44 is divisible by 4, since we can write 44 = (4)(11), where 11 is an integer.

AND, 0 is divisible by 4, since we can write 0 = (4)(0), where 0 is an integer.

Does that help?

Cheers,

Brent

## I believe you have an error

https://www.beatthegmat.com/on-a-weekend-6-college-friends-went-skiing-and-t300108.html

## Good catch - I've edited my

Good catch - I've edited my response accordingly.

## Just to be clear, when we are

## 0 IS a multiple of all

0 IS a multiple of all integers.

We say N is a multiple of integer d if there exists an INTEGER k so that N = kd

For example, 30 is a multiple of 5 because we can write 30 = 6(5)

Likewise, 21 is a multiple of 7 because we can write 21 = 3(7)

Likewise, 0 is a multiple of 7 because we can write 0 = 0(7)

Likewise, 0 is a multiple of 12 because we can write 0 = 0(12)

Likewise, 0 is a multiple of 55 because we can write 0 = 0(55)

1, on the other hand, is a multiple of 1 and -1 only

That said, when it comes to Integer Property questions, the GMAT typically restricts all values to POSITIVE integers.

Cheers,

Brent

## https://gmatclub.com/forum/is

So if I missed out on the tiny detail that pqr were not clearly said to be integers in this question and I applied to fact that 0 is a multiple of all integers to prove that both statements in this question were not sufficient, it would still have been a valid reasoning. Right?

## Question link: https:/

Question link: https://gmatclub.com/forum/is-the-product-pqr-divisible-by-216152.html

Can you show me how you'd show that both statements in this question are not sufficient?

Cheers,

Brent

## Hi Brent, referring to the

## Good question!

Good question!

We don't need a proviso that says the sum can't be zero. Here's why:

If the sum of the digits of integer N is zero, then we know that N = 0

Since 0 is divisible by 3, the rule still holds.

Having said all of that, when it comes to Integer Properties questions, the GMAT typically restricts the values to POSITIVE integers. So, the idea that 0 is divisible by 3 (or any other non-zero integer) does not come into play.

Does that help?

Cheers,

Brent

## Hi Brent, any rule for

https://gmatclub.com/forum/10-25-560-is-divisible-by-all-of-the-following-except-126300.html

Similar to rule for 4, can we say if the last 2 digits are divisible by 8 then the number is divisible by 8?

## Question link: https:/

Question link: https://gmatclub.com/forum/10-25-560-is-divisible-by-all-of-the-followin...

Another great question.

I've never seen an OFFICIAL question require us to know the divisibility rule for 8 (or for 7 or for 11).

That said, I've seen plenty of test prep companies create questions that hinge on the divisibility rule for 8 (and for 7 and for 11). The linked question is such a question.

The rule for divisibility by 8 is as follows:

If the number created by last 3 digits of integer N is divisible by 8, then N is divisible by 8.

Take, for example, the number 76,880

The number created by last 3 digits is 880

Since 880 is divisible by 8, we know that 76,880 is divisible by 8.

Likewise, we can take the number 1,233,126

The number created by last 3 digits is 126

Since 126 is divisible by 8, we know that 1,233,126 is divisible by 8.

Cheers,

Brent

## Add a comment