Have questions about your preparation or an upcoming test? Need help modifying the Study Plan to meet your unique needs? No problem. Just book a Skype meeting with Brent to discuss these and any other questions you may have.

- Video Course
- Video Course Overview
- General GMAT Strategies - 7 videos (free)
- Data Sufficiency - 16 videos (free)
- Arithmetic - 38 videos
- Powers and Roots - 36 videos
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 73 videos
- Word Problems - 48 videos
- Geometry - 42 videos
- Integer Properties - 38 videos
- Statistics - 20 videos
- Counting - 27 videos
- Probability - 23 videos
- Analytical Writing Assessment - 5 videos (free)
- Reading Comprehension - 10 videos (free)
- Critical Reasoning - 38 videos
- Sentence Correction - 70 videos
- Integrated Reasoning - 17 videos

- Study Guide
- Your Instructor
- Office Hours
- Extras
- Prices

## Comment on

Divisor of 86420## Hi just trying to assess how

## This is a SUPER HARD question

This is a SUPER HARD question. It's definitely 750+

## Hi Brent, if we consider any

We get 72/(6^-2) = 72/(1\36) = (72)(36)

This makes 6^-2 a divisor of 72, in the same way for the above ques we can consider any -ve value for n?

## That's a great idea, but we

That's a great idea, but we can't say that 6^(-2) a divisor of 72.

Divisors must be INTEGERS, and 6^(-2) = 1/16 (which is not an integer)

Cheers,

Brent

## Good question

## I'm glad you like it :-)

I'm glad you like it :-)

## Please let me know if this is

2 x 2 x 5 x 11 x 17 x 23

By recognizing there is no 3 in the prime factorization, i concluded 6 (nor any multiple of 6 i.e 6^n) is not a divisor of 86420, meaning n must equal 0, knowing that the question is not flawed. by assuming n is 0, i solved and got 1.

## That approach is perfect (yet

That approach is perfect (yet time consuming).

minor point: Although the approach is 100% valid, your prime factorization is a little off.

86,420 = 2 x 2 x 5 x 29 x 149 (still no 3's! ;-)

Cheers,

Brent

## Add a comment