Have questions about your preparation or an upcoming test? Need help modifying the Study Plan to meet your unique needs? No problem. Just book a Skype meeting with Brent to discuss these and any other questions you may have.
- Video Course
- Video Course Overview
- General GMAT Strategies - 7 videos (free)
- Data Sufficiency - 16 videos (free)
- Arithmetic - 38 videos
- Powers and Roots - 36 videos
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 73 videos
- Word Problems - 48 videos
- Geometry - 42 videos
- Integer Properties - 38 videos
- Statistics - 20 videos
- Counting - 27 videos
- Probability - 23 videos
- Analytical Writing Assessment - 5 videos (free)
- Reading Comprehension - 10 videos (free)
- Critical Reasoning - 38 videos
- Sentence Correction - 70 videos
- Integrated Reasoning - 17 videos
- Study Guide
- Blog
- Philosophy
- Office Hours
- Extras
- Prices
Comment on Jeffery Clapton and Friends
I was not able to figure out
The word "commonly" is next
The word "commonly" is next to both "Claptan" and "observed," so we'd have use some context to determine which word it's modifying.
Hi Brent,
The statement identifies a group of traits that a particular person has and those traits have been discussed in reference to a particular time period.
So when it's said that Jeffery had those traits , Does it imply that Jeffery lost those traits in current time?
Going through this has-had confusion.
Please assist.
Thanks
Prachi
Great question!!
Great question!!
One HAD doesn't imply that Jeffery lost those traits in current time. These events happened in the past, so we must refer to them in simple past tense (...OBSERVED that he HAD...).
Also note that our only reasonable second choice is the present tense, as in "...friends commonly observed that he (Jeffery) HAS many endearing personality traits." This construction suggests that these friends were able to see into the future and confirm that Jeffery's endearing traits will last well into 2019.
However, if the sentence read "...commonly observed that he HAD HAD...", then that would, imply that Jeffery lost those traits prior to the time period in which people were making the observations about Jeffery.
Does that help?
Cheers,
Brent
Yes Brent, it really does
I should be really careful while dealing with tenses in the problems.
Regards,
Prachi
Hi Brent,
What about double possessives:
Here is an abstract of the grammar book I have:
Double possessives
We can use a double possessive — noun + of + noun (with possessive 's) — to show that the
the first noun means 'one of several'. We usually use the indefinite article with this pattern:
I heard the story from a friend of my brother's. (= one of my brother's friends)
Based on that rule I didn't see any problem with "friends and colleagues of Jeffery Clapton's"
this is the same as to say: friends and colleagues of mine
What do you think?
It seems redundant to have OF
It seems redundant to have OF + POSSESSIVE, since the OF already indicates possession.
Fortunately, there are additional issues (regarding tense) that allow us to eliminate A, B and C.
Here's a similar sentence: https://gmatclub.com/forum/after-the-civil-war-contemporaries-of-harriet...
Cheers,
Brent
Ok I understand
Thank you so much