Question: 1/10 and 1/2

Rate this video: 

Comment on 1/10 and 1/2

We can also solve for 1) as follow, instead of using all values and make calculation
we can rewrite expression in 1) as

10>4x+2>2, this means, 4x+2 can be 3,4,5,6,7,8 or 9
if we solve above, we get
divide by 4
that leave us option: x=1.

Can we do following?
1/x<1/y<1/z then x>y>z, i think so.
gmat-admin's picture


Your suggested rule (if 1/x <1/y < 1/z then x > y > z) is true AS LONG AS x, y, and z are all positive or all negative.

For example, 1/(-2) < 1/(-3) < 1/2, however we can't say that -2 > -3 > 2

Thank you so much.

I really liked your videos. The way that you solves and explains little facts are really amazing as these little facts can trick in simple questions.


Great video. Question: on test day, would we have to go through each of the integers from 3-9 to figure something like this out? Or is there a way we can identify a shortcut when we see something like this? If not, I guess just knowing this question type beforehand will save us time so we can get right to it.
gmat-admin's picture

Once we know that 4x+2 equals one of the integers from 3 to 9, we can automatically eliminate all of the ODD integers, since 4x will be EVEN and when we add 2, the result is EVEN.

This leaves us with 4, 6 or 8 top test.

Thank you!


Please help me, I solved the first stated as below.

1/10 < 1/4x+2 < 1/2

0.1 < 1/4x+2 < 0.5

Since there is no integer that lies between 0.1 & 0.5, I declared this statement to be insufficient.
gmat-admin's picture

Be careful. We are told that x is an integer. We are not told that 1/(4x+2) is an integer.

For example, ix x = 1, then 1/(4x+2) = 1/6 = 0.166...


Exercise 224 (Problem Solving - OG 2017)
Could you explain me in a different way from OG 2017 answer solution?

Thank you in advance.

gmat-admin's picture

At the risk of appearing to "pass the buck," I'd like to direct you to a very rich discussion of this question here:

In particular, Mitch (GMATGuruNY) provides a concise solution.
Also, Ceilidh (from Manhattan Prep) explains why this might be a great candidate for guessing and moving on.

If you have any questions about those various solutions, I'm happy to respond. I just don't think I'd do much better than Mitch's solution.

Hey Brent, on statement 2, when I got (x+6)(x-1), I concluded that x must be -6 or 1, and then made the mistake of checking for extraneous roots, which took extra time. How do you know when to check for extraneous roots?
gmat-admin's picture

You only need check for extraneous roots when dealing with equations with square roots and equations with absolute value.


To avoid testing all the values for statement 1, I just converted it into an inequality 10>4x+2>2 , then solve it to get 2>x>0, given x is integer, answer must be 1.
gmat-admin's picture

That works too. Nice job!

Hi Brent, for statement 1, would it be okay to split the inequality into two separate ones.

Such that 1/10 < 1/4x+2 < 1/2 becomes:

1) 1/10 < 1/4x+2 and 2) 1/4x+2 < 1/2

This gives us 1) x < 2 and 2) x > 0

If we combine 1) and 2) again to bring back us back to to the original equality, we get:

0<x<2. Since x is an integer, x must be 1.

Just want to know if this approach works for all inequality questions with 2 inequality signs.

gmat-admin's picture

That's a perfectly valid solution. Nice work.


Add a comment

Ask on Beat The GMAT

If you have any questions, ask them on the Beat The GMAT discussion forums. The average response time is typically less than 30 minutes.

Change Playback Speed

You have the option of watching our videos at various speeds (25% faster, 50% faster, etc). To change the playback speed, click the settings icon on the right side of the video status bar.

Have a question about this video?

Post your question in the Comment section below, and we’ll answer it as fast as humanly possible.

Free “Question of the Day” emails!