The GMAT scoring algorithm penalizes you much more for getting easy questions wrong than it rewards you for getting difficult questions right. So, it’s better to guess on hard questions so you’ll have enough time to answer easier questions.

- Video Course
- Video Course Overview
- General GMAT Strategies - 7 videos (free)
- Data Sufficiency - 16 videos (free)
- Arithmetic - 38 videos
- Powers and Roots - 36 videos
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 73 videos
- Word Problems - 48 videos
- Geometry - 42 videos
- Integer Properties - 38 videos
- Statistics - 20 videos
- Counting - 27 videos
- Probability - 23 videos
- Analytical Writing Assessment - 5 videos (free)
- Reading Comprehension - 10 videos (free)
- Critical Reasoning - 38 videos
- Sentence Correction - 70 videos
- Integrated Reasoning - 17 videos

- Study Guide
- Blog
- Philosophy
- Office Hours
- Extras
- Prices

## Comment on

Useful Contradictions## I am quite new to algebra

## Yes, you are correct. The

Yes, you are correct. The purpose of the video is to demonstrate that the properties of DS questions can help you identify errors that test-takers may make. So, at 2:55, we use this property to identify our mistake and then correct our factorization.

## There is a mistake in the

## Yes, the mistake was made

The "mistake" was made intentionally to show how a certain property of Data Sufficiency questions can help us identify errors we might make in our calculations.

So, in statement 1, we conclude that x = -2 or x = -3.

In statement 2, we conclude (incorrectly) that x = 4 or x = 6.

Since we arrive at CONTRADICTORY results, we know that we must have made a mistake in one of our calculations, and we can re-check our work to see where we erred.

So, around 2:50 in the video, we use this property to identify our mistake and correct our factorization.

## But, it can also be the case

## The statements will NEVER

The statements will NEVER contradict each other. So, if it seems like there's a contradiction, then we can be certain that the test-taker made an error.

## Hello, excellent course! Just

If we can assume that both sentences are always true and they do not contradict each other, couldn't we conclude that since they're both ecuations in function of X with only variable they both must be sufficient to determine the value of X, independently of one another?

Thank you,

## Not always.

Not always.

Consider this example:

What is the value of x?

(1) 2x = 6

(2) x² = 9

Both statements are true, but only one statement (statement 1) is sufficient to answer the target question alone.

## for your last comment 2nd sep

## You're referring to the

You're referring to the question:

What is the value of x?

(1) 2x = 6

(2) x² = 9

Statement 1 is sufficient because there is only one possible solution: x = 3

Statement 2 is not sufficient because there are two possible solutions: x = 3 and x = -3

Notice that 3² = 9 and (-3)² = 9

Does that help?

Cheers,

Brent

## Wouldn't it be a waste of

## Great question, Max!

Great question, Max!

There are A few IF's in your proposed rule that we should examine, but, in short, we can say:

If each quadratic equation yields two DIFFERENT possible x-values, and if the two quadratic equations do not yield the SAME two possible x-values, then the correct answer must be C.

However, there are different things that can mess up this rule. Here are two examples:

If x > 0, what is the value of x?

(1) x² + x - 6 = 0

Solving this quadratic, we see that EITHER x = 2 OR x = -3

Since we're told x > 0, we can be certain that x = 2

So, statement 1 is sufficient on its own.

------------------------------------------------

What is the value of x?

(1) x² - 6x + 9 = 0

(2) x² + 2x - 15 = 0

Factoring (1), we get: (x - 3)(x - 3) = 0

So, it MUST be the case that x = 3

So, statement 1 is sufficient on its own.

Factoring (2), we get: (x - 3)(x + 5) = 0

So, EITHER x = 3 OR x = -5

So, statement 2 is NOT sufficient on its own.

-------------------------------------------------

I like you're proposed rule, just as long as you're aware of a few potential loopholes.

Cheers,

Brent

## Hey Brett,

Is the combined statement sufficient because both results contain x= -2?

## You're referring to the

You're referring to the question that appears at 1:25 in the above video.

The answer to your question is yes.

Keep in mind that both statements are true.

So, since x = -2 is the only value the two statements have in common, it must be the case that x = -2

Cheers,

Brent - now with 50% less "t" :-)

## Hi Brent,

I am new to Data sufficiency amd watching this video concerning the contradictions, I am confused.

WHen we tackle the Data sufficiency, is it true that we will solve each statement indvudually. So I think it would be possible that different statements (alternatives) will provide different result/outcome?

Why we need to compare the two results from the 2 statements at the end?

Thanks.

Stanley

## Yes, you must definitely

Yes, you must definitely analyze each statement individually, but that is not what this video covers.

The key concept covered in this video is that both statement are 100% true.

Consider this question:

What is the value of x?

(1) 2x = 6

(2) x + 1 = 11

The above question would never appear on the GMAT, since it's impossible for both statements to be true.

That is, statement 1 tells us that x = 3, while statement 2 tells us that x = 10.

Now consider this example:

What is the value of x?

(1) x² = 16

(2) x² - x - 12 = 0

This COULD be an actual GMAT question, because both statements are 100% true.

Statement 1 tells us that EITHER x = 4 OR x = -4. So, statement 1 not sufficient.

IMPORTANT: It is 100% true that EITHER x = 4 OR x = -4

Upon factoring statement 2, we get: (x - 4)(x + 3) = 0. This tells us that EITHER x = 4 OR x = -3.

So, statement 2 not sufficient.

IMPORTANT: It is 100% true that EITHER x = 4 OR x = -3

Here, the correct answer is C because, when we COMBINE the statements, we know that x MUST equal 4 (since it is the ONLY value that satisfies both TRUE statements.

So, what do we do if we come across a DS question in which statement 1 tells us that EITHER x = 1 OR x = 2, and statement 2 tells us that EITHER x = 5 OR x = 6?

It appears that these two statements contradict each other.

That is, both statements cannot be true.

Since both statements are ALWAYS true in a DS question, we can be certain that we made a MISTAKE when we concluded that statement 1 tells us that EITHER x = 1 OR x = 2, and statement 2 tells us that EITHER x = 5 OR x = 6.

This "useful" contradiction tells us to go back and re-analyze the two statements.

Does that help?

## Hi Brent,

Could I understand that this method would be applied in the statement that has a particular value ?

Thanks.

## That's correct.

That's correct.

## How did we conclude that X =

## That's correct.

That's correct.

Statement 1 tells us that x = -2 or -3

Statement 2 tells us that x = -2 or 12

When we combine the two statements (both of which are true), it must be the case that x = -2.