If you have any questions, ask them on the Beat The GMAT discussion forums. The average response time is typically __less than 30 minutes__.

- Video Course
- Video Course Overview - READ FIRST
- General GMAT Strategies - 7 videos (all free)
- Data Sufficiency - 16 videos (all free)
- Arithmetic - 38 videos (some free)
- Powers and Roots - 36 videos (some free)
- Algebra and Equation Solving - 73 videos (some free)
- Word Problems - 48 videos (some free)
- Geometry - 42 videos (some free)
- Integer Properties - 38 videos (some free)
- Statistics - 20 videos (some free)
- Counting - 27 videos (some free)
- Probability - 23 videos (some free)
- Analytical Writing Assessment - 5 videos (all free)
- Reading Comprehension - 10 videos (all free)
- Critical Reasoning - 38 videos (some free)
- Sentence Correction - 70 videos (some free)
- Integrated Reasoning - 17 videos (some free)

- Study Guide
- Office Hours
- Extras
- Guarantees
- Prices

## Comment on

“Fixing” the Denominator## I think rather than using

## I totally agree that that

I totally agree that that would save time.

I don't mention the Difference of Squares approach (found here https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-algebra-and-equation-solving/vid...), because many students follow the course as it's laid out in the Learning Guide, and those students haven't covered that lesson yet.

## For the second question, why

-Yvonne

## That's totally valid. However

That's totally valid. However, once we get to (2√50)/15, we need to recognize that we can simplify this fraction further, since √50 = √(25 x 2) = √25 x √2 = 5√2

So, (2√50)/15 = 2(5√2)/15 = 2√2/3

## Hi Brent,

What would be the conjugate of a denominator with 3 variables (e.g. 3+3√7-4√6)? Would that ever be asked?

## Here's a video on

Here's a video on rationalizing the denominator when there are 3 terms: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPtOMrrsoME

As you can see, the technique is far too time consuming to ever be part of a GMAT test. So, don't worry about it.

## Add a comment