# Lesson: Solving Equations with Exponents

## Comment on Solving Equations with Exponents

### Need some help with this one,

Need some help with this one, especially how to figure out /solve this part of the equation: [2^(1-x)]^2. Whole question: If 2^4x = 3,600, what is the value of [2^(1-x)]^2 ? ### Hi Robert,

Hi Robert,

We want to EITHER make [2^(1-x)]^2 resemble the given expression, 2^4x OR make the given expression resemble [2^(1-x)]^2

Given: 2^4x = 3,600

Find the square root of both sides (i.e., raise both sides to the power of 1/2)

We get: (2^4x)^1/2 = 3600^1/2

Simplify: 2^2x = 60

Raise both sides to power of -1 to get: (2^2x)^-1 = 60^-1

Simplify: 2^(-2x) = 1/60 [you'll see why I did this shortly]

Our GOAL is to find the value of [2^(1-x)]^2

[2^(1-x)]^2 = 2^(2-2x)

= (2^2)/[2^(-2x)]

= (2^2)/[1/60] since we 2^(-2x) = 1/60

= (2^2)(60)

= 240

### Thanks! However I realized a

Thanks! However I realized a second after I submitted the question that the part I was having difficulty was, was the "Quotient Law" rule that had me perplexed and confused because it was subtracted and not in it's divided form.

### Brent, I like your method of

Brent, I like your method of explanation. With that said how would you explain the solution to the problem below:

Each of the following equations has at least one solution EXCEPT

A. –2^n = (–2)^-n
B. 2^-n = (–2)^n
C. 2^n = (–2)^-n
D. (–2)^n = –2^n
E. (–2)^-n = –2^-n ### When I SCAN the answer

When I SCAN the answer choices, the first thing that comes to mind is that, n = 0 and n = 1 are possible solutions.

So, let's first see what happens when let n = 0
We get:

A. –2^0 = (–2)^-0
NOTE: -2^0 is the same as -(2^0)
So, we have: –(2^0) = (–2)^-0
Evaluate both sides: -1 = 1
Okay, so n = 0 is NOT a solution to the equation.
So, KEEP answer choice A for now

B. 2^-0 = (–2)^0
Evaluate both sides to get: 1 = 1
So, n = 0 IS a solution to the equation.
ELIMINATE B

C. 2^0 = (–2)^-0
Evaluate both sides to get: 1 = 1
So, n = 0 IS a solution to the equation.
ELIMINATE C

D. (–2)^0 = –2^0
Evaluate both sides to get: 1 = -1
So n = 0 is NOT a solution to the equation.
KEEP answer choice D for now

E. (–2)^-0 = –2^-0
Evaluate both sides to get: 1 = -1
So n = 0 is NOT a solution to the equation.
KEEP answer choice E for now

So, we have have answer choices A, D and E remaining

Another possible value for n to consider is 1
So, let's see what happens when let n = 1
We get:

A. –2^1 = (–2)^-1
NOTE: -2^1 is the same as -(2^1)
So, we have: –(2^1) = (–2)^-1
Evaluate both sides: -2 = -1/2
Okay, so n = 1 is NOT a solution to the equation.
So, KEEP answer choice A for now

D. (–2)^1 = –2^1
Evaluate both sides to get: -2 = -2
So, n = 1 IS a solution to the equation.
ELIMINATE D

E. (–2)^-1 = –2^-1
Evaluate both sides to get: -1/2 = -1/2
So, n = 1 IS a solution to the equation.
ELIMINATE E

We're left with the correct answer: A

### Hi Brent,

Hi Brent,

how do we quickly identify which numbers to use? I arbitrarily chose 2 and then 3 and found that all the equations do not equate. Is there a mathematical explanation? ### Since each of the 5 equations

Since each of the 5 equations had SIMILAR expressions on both sides, I chose to test n = 0 and n = 1, since those values would have similar effects on each side of the equation.

If those values didn't yield a single answer, then I'd extend my values to include n = -1 and then perhaps n = 2

I hope that helps.

Cheers,
Brent

### Hi Brent! What happens if the

Hi Brent! What happens if the base is less than 0 (but not -1) ? I mean, If I have, for instance, this equation: (1/10)^(2x)=10^(3x+2). Could I do:10^((-1)(2x))=10^(3x+2) and then solve for -2x=3x+2 ? ### Hi Pau,

Hi Pau,

Your approach is perfect. By rewriting 1/10 as 10^(-1), you are able to then set the exponents equal to each other.

### can you help me with this one

can you help me with this one please:
If 2^(4x) = 3,600, what is the value of [2^(1−x)]² ?

(A) -1/15
(B) 1/15
(C) 3/10
(D) -3/10
(E) 1 ### Hello sir, In one of your

Hello sir, In one of your answer to the above listed question

https://gmatclub.com/forum/is-5-k-less-than-144719.html

When you divided by 5 both sides why didn't you change the inequality sign ?
In one of your lesson of algebra you told to do so ...Please explain i'm a bit confused. Be careful. When we divide both sides of an inequality by a NEGATIVE value, then we REVERSE the direction of the inequality symbol.

When we divide both sides of an inequality by a POSITIVE value, then the direction of the inequality symbol REMAINS THE SAME.

Here's the video on working with inequalities: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-algebra-and-equation-solving/vid...

Cheers,
Brent

Thank you sir :)