Lesson: Strengthen the Argument Questions

Comment on Strengthen the Argument Questions

Thank you for designing this amazing preparation tool.
I notice that in weaken/strengthen the argument questions, we analyse which "premise" is weakening or strengthening the argument. is it possible that we have to look for an assumption rather than a premise ?
Best,
Sage
gmat-admin's picture

Yes, you can look for assumptions too. Remember that an assumption is just an unstated premise that must be true. So, either way, you're looking for a type of premise.
More here: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-critical-reasoning/video/1133

I notice a question stem that seems to be fitting several of the question types. The question stem is "Which of the following most logically completes the argument" - and it's so 'Strengthen The Argument' questions as well as "Assumption' and 'Structure' questions -- what is the best way to differentiate? Thanks!
-Yvonne
gmat-admin's picture

It depends on the argument passage ends.

In some cases, the argument is missing a conclusion. So, the question is a Conclusion/Inference question in disguise.

Other times, it can be a Flawed Argument question. For example, "Despite Joe's thoughtful points, his conclusion his incorrect because __"

And so on. In fact, questions that ask "Which of the following most logically completes the argument?" can be pretty much any question type. It all depends on the passage that needs completing.

Hello, thanks for this amazing lecture! I have a question here:
So for the tips: what is the difference between
“supporting or elaborating on an existing premise” as a common way to strengthen an argument
and
“watch out for answer choices that support a premise but not the conclusion”?

What is the difference in these two ways of "supporting a premise”? Could you give me an example on that?

Thank you so much!
gmat-admin's picture

Good question.

Perhaps I should have elaborated on those seemingly contradictory statements :-)

If a premise already supports the conclusion, then an answer choice that elaborates on or further supports that premise will strengthen the argument.

However, if a premise either weakens the conclusion or has no effect on the conclusion, then an answer choice that elaborates on or further supports that premise will not strengthen the argument.

Here's a very basic example:

Sue's favorite food is pizza. Everyone at Jefferson High School respects Sue. Therefore, Sue will likely be elected school president.

Which of the following best strengthen the argument?

A) Everyone at school likes Sue because she is a great leader.

B) Sue eats pizza for breakfast most mornings, and she often carries a piece of pizza in her pocket.

Yes, it's a silly question!

As you can see, both answer choices elaborate on/support premises in the argument. However, since the pizza premise is already irrelevant, answer choice B does not strengthen the argument (although it does strengthen the premise that Sue really likes pizza!), whereas answer choice A DOES strengthen the argument.

Hi Brent- is this strengthen the argument question? Doesn't sound so from question stem

https://gmatclub.com/forum/which-of-the-following-most-logically-completes-the-argument-49838.html
gmat-admin's picture

Question linK: https://gmatclub.com/forum/which-of-the-following-most-logically-complet...

Yes, it's a strengthen the argument question.

The conclusion is that "planting spring wheat will be more profitable than planting winter wheat."

The question stem asks us to identify information that supports this conclusion.

Hi Brent,

In below question I did shortlist option E but I felt it talks about targeted advertisement where as conclusion refers to targeted individuals. Targeted advertisement can be set to larger set of individuals which are not targeted
individuals.

Please explain.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/advertising-by-mail-has-become-much-less-effective-with-fewer-consume-201330.html

gmat-admin's picture

Question link: https://gmatclub.com/forum/advertising-by-mail-has-become-much-less-effe...

I think the test-makers are treating "target individuals" and "targeted advertising" as equivalent. This was my impression as well.

By the way, Mitch (GMATGuruNY) provides a nice analysis of the question here: http://www.beatthegmat.com/2016-og-cr-60-t291151.html

Add a comment

Ask on Beat The GMAT

If you have any questions, ask them on the Beat The GMAT discussion forums. The average response time is typically less than 30 minutes.

Change Playback Speed

To watch our videos at faster speeds (e.g., 20% or 50% faster), download this free extension for your Chrome web browser.  

Have a question about this video?

Post your question in the Comment section below, and we’ll answer it as fast as humanly possible.